« The clinical utility of fetal lung maturity testing revisited 20 years later | Main | Laboratory testing for premature rupture of membranes »

Sunday, January 06, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


This is a great post and the concluding algorithm makes a lot of sense . . . EXCEPT in a critical arena: timing. One of the real promises of cell-free DNA screening is how early it can be done. Having reliable screening results by 12 weeks (test at 10 weeks + 2 weeks for results) instead of 16-18 weeks for the quad screen is HUGE.

I think it will be within pretty short order that the bulleted concerns will be addressed and the algorithm will become cell-free DNA screening -> diagnostic testing.

David Grenache

Good point, Jessica. Thanks for the comment!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Follow on Twitter